[Review&QnA] Celestron 93428 X-Cel LX 1.25-Inch 3x Barlow Lens (Black)


Electronics > Camera & Photo > Accessories > Telescope & Microscope Accessories > Telescope Accessories > Barlow Lenses

[Review&QnA] Celestron 93428 X-Cel LX 1.25-Inch 3x Barlow Lens (Black)
GotoProduct
About this item
  • Quality X Cel LX 3x Barlow triples the magnification of any 1.25 inch eyepiece, perfect for owners of fast, short focal length telescopes
  • 3 element apochromatic, fully multi coated optics offer up bright, sharp images with excellent color correction
  • A rubber grip helps to avoid accidental drops
  • Barrel is threaded to accept standard 1.25 inch filters
  • A brass compression ring holds eyepiece firmly in place
  • Quality X-Cel LX 3x Barlow triples the magnification of any 1.25” eyepiece, perfect for owners of fast, short focal length telescopes
  • 3-element apochromatic, fully multi-coated optics offer up bright, sharp images with excellent color correction
  • A rubber grip helps to avoid accidental drops
  • Barrel is threaded to accept standard 1.25” filters
  • A brass compression ring holds eyepiece firmly in place

Review

Blown away by planetary images using this 3X Barlow
Size: 3x - 1.25” – X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
I am so blown-away at the planetary images I can capture with this 3X Barlow lens attached to my 130mm Newtonian telescope. The attached images of Jupiter (with visible Great Red Spot and 3 moons) and Saturn are from my Celestron AstroMaster 130 (with Telrad Finder) and ZWO ASI120 MC-S camera attached to the X-Cel LX 3X Barlow. The images were processed using AutoStakkert! 2.6.8 and RegiStax 6 software.
 
Best in Class
Size: 2x - 1.25" - X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
This replaces a very good 1990s vintage Celestron Ultima Barlow. The Ultima was considered perhaps as the best short Barlow on the market for its time. Both this and the Ultima are quite similar in certain respects:

1) They are designed to work in star diagonals
2) They are three element Barlows

I purchased the X-Cel 2x based on the performance of the 3x version, which featured class leading contrast and sharpness, and the ability to deal with difficult eyepieces with a bit more grace than the Ultima. Key to the contrast performance is the hollow top, which eliminates a major potential source of reflections.

The 2x is a bit shorter than the 3x and handles difficult eyepieces a little better. Contrast and sharpness is exceptional. People often comment that a good Barlow should act as if it wasn't there, except for the increase in magnification. By that definition there are no good Barlows, but of the many I have tried, these come the closest. I have tried Meade, Explore Scientific, Baader, and Televue (earlier models).

Some general thoughts on Barlows for beginners.

1) Know your telescope's limits. If your scope is well collimated, your magnification limit will fall somewhere between 30x-60x per inch of aperture. A 10mm eyepiece will give you 200x (25x/inch) in a telescope like the C8. Putting a 2x Barlow in there boosts the power to 400x (50x/inch). A C8 tends to do best around 30x/inch. A 3x Barlow simply makes the situation worse. Try using a 2x Barlow with a 15mm to 20mm eyepiece with this scope.

2) Know your viewing conditions. To use high magnifications, the air you look through must be fairly steady. The overall steadiness of the air is called "seeing." If you rarely get steady nights, limit your eyepiece purchases to those magnifications you are likely to use frequently. You can then use the Barlow on those uncommon, steady nights.

3) A bad eyepiece is a single bad eyepiece. A bad Barlow has the potential to mess up a bunch of eyepieces. Don't cheap out. If you use a star diagonal, avoid two element, short Barlows, even if they are cheaper. They simply don't work that well. That third element makes a difference. Some short, two element Barlows let you thread off the optical elements, and thread them directly into an eyepiece, giving a 1.3x to 1.5x boost in magnification. That arrangement is usually worse optically than the two element Barlow attached to its own tube.

4) If you just use a Newtonian reflector, consider a longer Barlow, as they are easier to make well. Amateur astronomers have high praise for the Televue 2x and the Orion Tri-mag (3x).
 
I feel like I was robbed!
Size: 3x - 1.25” – X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
Opening) was suprised when I removed it , it was bigger than I imagined. (1st impressions) it appears first impressions was a factor when designing it . Looks good , feels nice . (Utilization) put it in , took a look and was satisfied but just barely. It was humid out so I figured the moist air diminished the quality of what I saw . Well tonight is super clear and went out to look up and thought to compare the stock 3×barlow. When I swapped for the new one I couldnt believe how the new barlow was that much better than the stock barlow. They are both 3×'s and I figured the knew it would look better but it appeared to be 2-3×'s higher magnification and exponentially higher clarity . Im not just satisfied im blown away as well , pisst off is also a good description for the simple fact that the stock barlow is an insult , so celestron if u read this throw that crap away and give a better barlow please
 
Before and After live video
Verified Purchase
  Celestron Barlow Lens 3X 1.25in X-cel Lx I purchased this 3 Times Barlow X-Cel LX with the intention of obtaining closer live detailed images from the Moon with a Webcam made to fit the X-Cel LX Series eyepieces and it works great! This video is in 720P and is mounted on the 9mm X-Cel XL Eyepiece.Without the Barlow then With the Barlow
 
Barlows are Always Handy (Great one to have)
Size: 2x - 1.25" - X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
Barlows are a must in any astronomers bag of accessories. I tend to keep a 2x 2,5x and 3x hand, but not too much higher outside of that. You can get them in 4x or larger but not a Celestron make.

You can piggy back these too to get 6x if you need that with a larger eye piece like 32 or 52mm

They are solid and work well.
 
It's great
Size: 3x - 1.25” – X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
Excellent barlow. Good clarity. Have used it with canon t6i to capture planets with no eyepieces.
 
Really nice barlow
Size: 2x - 1.25" - X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
Used with a Orion SkyView 6 telescope, 26mm plossel & 8mm Baader Hyperion. This is a great bang-for-buck barlow. There is a slight, but noticeable loss of light that is completely expected/normal for barlows. That's the worst I can say. The clarity is excellent. Overall quality & design are great too. I'm very happy with this purchase.
 
New tricks on an old dog.
Verified Purchase
I have a 20 year old Celestron 114" Newtonian telescope that was in the attic for a number of years. The really basic eye pieces that it came with back in the day were terrible to start with. I had a ton of fun with them nonetheless. So when the Comet Lovejoy got all the craze, I decided to pull out my old telescope. I cleaned the mirror and looked up. The eye pieces were scratched and utterly useless. So I purchased both the 25mm and the 7mm X-Cel eye pieces and this X-Cel LX 3x barlow Lens. All I can say is holy smokes! It's like a whole new telescope. The clarity and field of view is amazing. The X-Cel LX series of optics is so well worth the price, I really can't say enough of how amazed I was with them.
 
Barlows are Always Great (This is a nice one to have)
Size: 3x - 1.25” – X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
Barlows are a must in any astronomers bag of accessories. I tend to keep a 2x 2,5x and 3x hand, but not too much higher outside of that. You can get them in 4x or larger but not a Celestron make.

You can piggy back these too to get 6x if you need that with a larger eye piece like 32 or 52mm

They are solid and work well.
 
High Quality Barlow
Size: 2x - 1.25" - X-Cel LX Barlow Lens | Verified Purchase
I love the X-Cel LX Series of eyepieces. And a 2X Barlow makes it easy to swap out lenses to get a great variety. I would recommend.
 
See more reviews

Custom Questions & answers

Question:Can I use this Barlow eyepiece in conjunction with the Zoom lend Celestron 93230 8mm/24mm on the Celestron First scope? The Zoom eyepiece works great
Answer:I do. I love the zoom lense because I can find what I'm looking for easily. Coupled with the Barlow you can get in a lot tighter on the planet, for example. It's a lot easier to see the rings of Saturn with zoom lens and the Barlow put together. It does make my Celestron Travelscope more prone to tipping over, however.
 
Question:Will this work with the Celestron Travel Scope 70 ??
Answer:Yes, but it is overkill. There is no magic that will make your $90 telescope into the Hubble Space Telescope. A simple word of advice here: buy a better telescope before investing any more in this one. Do not expect much more that 100x magnification from this telescope, no matter what you may add to it.
 
Question:Is 3x barlows work with Celestron 21035 70mm Travel Scope? If it is too much for my travel scope, should I use 2x barlows to focus properly?
Answer:It might work, but you may need better eyepieces, and a stronger tripod. You may have to put the Barlow between the scope and diagonal - I think this is generally true for Refractor scopes, and you may need a longer Barlow (maybe ask Celestron - sometimes, you can't focus these scopes with a Barlow). I have a 3x Barlow on my kids' cheap Meade refractor, and it's longer and plastic, but it works fine (they use a 25mm low-power EP with the Barlow, which is the equivalent of using a 8mm EP, but that's enough power to see tons of craters on the moon, Jupiter's stripes and moons, and Saturn's rings). Their Barlow came with the scope, but no instructions to put it in between the scope and diagonal, not between the diagonal and eyepiece (this is unlike SCT and reflector style scopes). The weight of this Barlow lens (and most semi-decent eyepieces) is probably the bigger issue, as it might be too heavy for the plastic focuser, and will definitely throw off the balance and weight limit of your tripod (if it doesn't just fall over, the tripod will have a harder time holding steady, and the focuser might bend or break). Still, can't hurt to try. Just buying a couple of decent, but relatively inexpensive Plossyl eyepieces (like from Meade's 4000 or 5000 series), will really make a difference, as it's the eyepieces that are the weakest part of budget scopes (that, and the tripod, of course). The 5mm high power one that came with my kids' scope was total junk. Most semi-decent "cheap" eyepieces cost more than your telescope. It's fun, but not a cheap hobby, if you really want to enjoy it. Spend your money on better eyepieces, and keep them for when you're ready to buy a nicer scope. The best objects in the sky, like nebulas and DSO's, don't require much magnification - they require more light (from a bigger diameter scope), but the planets are best w/high magnification, and your inexpensive refractor can give you crystal-clear views of Jupiter and Saturn, even under polluted skies. Wide view, low-power eyepieces let you see a bigger section of the sky - I often use low power EP's to find planets, and then I put in the Barlow or high-power eyepiece to see a close-up view. I'd get a nice wide angle low mag EP (25mm) for viewing star clusters and the Orion Nebula (maybe a few bright DSO's), and one high mag EP (8-10mm) for viewing planets and the moon. If you also get a Barlow, it's like doubling your EP collection. FYI - Your scope's maximum magnification is 165x. Scope's focal length = 400mm. Magnification = Magn. power of Barlow x (Scope's focal length/focal length of eyepiece). So, using a 10mm EP and a 3x Barlow, you get 3(400mm/10mm) = 120x, which is good for viewing planets and the moon. Magnification and brightness have an inverse relationship. The higher the magnification, the lower the light, so it's better to see stars and nebulae, which are dim, w/low power "wide angle" eyepieces, and save your high-power viewing for the planets and moon.
 
Question:does this fit the celestron nexstar 4se?
Answer:Yes, it does fit, but the real question is whether or not it will work with any specific eyepiece. We suggest that you limit that telescope to no more than 250x magnification. Do not use that Barlow in the NexStar 4SE with an eyepiece having less than 11mm focal length.
 
Question:Would this work with a 6se and a william optics binoviewer w/ 2 20mm eyepieces & 1.6x barlow nosepiece e-bino-p
Answer:That combination would yield 360x magnification, which is beyond the practical limits of your telescope. You might stand a fighting chance without the 1.6x Barlow in the stack. Keep in mind that that Barlow is supplied primarily to allow the binoviewer to achieve focus in a refractor; you would not need to use it with your SCT.
 
Question:will this be effective with an Astronomers without Borders OpenSky telescope or is it overkill?
Answer:The quick answer is Yes, it would be effective. I believe that out of the box the AWB OneSky Telescope comes with a 10 and 25mm lens. This Barlow lens will allow you to double your lens magnification for each essentially giving you roughly an additional 2 lens with one purchase. Be mindful that this Barlow is a 1.25" lens, ensure that you are buying the correct lens size. Enjoy your purchase it has proved helpful to me with my Celestron 8SE Telescope. Thank you for asking!
 
Question:I have the Orion SkyQuest XT8. I am unable to use this lens; the image is very blurred and I am unable to focus. Is it meant for the XT8?
Answer:What eye piece size are you using? It you are going to low, <10m, the magnification with this barlow might be exceeding what the scope can handle. You might also need to get an extender to move the eyepiece further back slightly, this might fix the focusing problem. One thing you can try is not inserting the eyepiece all the way into the Barlow. Holding it in place with your hand then trying to focus. If you can focus that way then you do need to get an extender.
 
Question:does it fit with Celestron 21024 FirstScope Telescope? i wanted the
Answer:Yes it will fit telescopes with 1.25" eyepieces.
 
Question:Hi, what is difference between XCEL, 9mm and 25mm? Which one is better? Are they ok on my astromaster AZ70? Thanks
Answer:Yes and no. Let me explain. It will double the magnification of your existing eyepieces, up to a practical limit of about 250x for this telescope. Combining it with the 25mm eyepiece supplied with the telescope will yield 100x magnification, which is useful.
The "no" side of this answer is that you could do better just buying another eyepiece for the same amount of money. Consider the X-Cel LX in either 9mm (139x) or 7mm (179x) as a better alternative.
 
Question:i wanted to know if this came with any permanent protective gear such as lens covers or even a small case. thanks for the feedback.
Answer:It has lens covers front and back but no case.
 
See more questions

Comments